Lurker > Nomadic View

Its just the boogeyman-of-the-month. In March itll probably rotate back to Russia.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Itd be awesome if they just defined the TOS, had some meetings or memos sent out to promote consistency, and abolish anonymity.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

@The_Admiral

Remember when you were hit for calling someone genius? What do you want to bet post #6 doesnt get the same treatment?
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Fake news says theyre not fake news. How compelling.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

I love when liberals just skate past any sense of diplomacy, legislation, or compromise and just jump to ban guns!

Its a relief knowing that theyre just barking in the wind. The Supreme Court is not going to rule that a contrary proposition to the Constitution is somehow unconstitutional (Ginsburg might, but shes almost dead anyway). And there will never be a revocation of the Second Amendment.

Just keep crying. Ill invest stock in flood insurance.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

I hope its Nancy Pelosi or Elizabeth Warren.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

I was expecting Poison Ivy.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Account bets should be enforced, honestly.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Why are you worried about people having firearms in their home? Afraid theyre going to shoot you if you break in?
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Is that the video where Rubio is explaining that such legislation will only ban cosmetics, and the guy yells Thats a good place to start! Then the crowd erupts?

Sounds like the perfect illustration of the lefts true intentions. They have no real interest in gun regulation. Theyre using gun regulation as a back door to chip away at gun rights until guns are just outright banned. If thats your intention, then yes, gun regulation is a good place to start.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Ice man

It sounds a lot cooler than it actually is. I worked at s grocery store and one of my responsibilities was to fill the ice machine. So, my friends that worked with me called me the ice man jokingly. Other people picked it up and called me that too.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

TheVipaGTS posted...

What ass?

---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

r4X0r posted...

Nomadic View posted...

Linking to fbi.gov for offensive.

Holy crap, YOU TOO?!!??

Just an FYI, linking to the CDC or Census Bureau can also get you modded for "offensive."

It got overturned, but it was kinda ridiculous that it got hit in the first place.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Linking to fbi.gov for offensive.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Loves
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

A bump stock ban doesnt really mean anything. You can achieve the same effect using a belt loop.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Of course.

All major world powers meddle for favorable outcomes.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Less security
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

TheVipaGTS posted...

El Mexicano Texano posted...

Majority if these kids don't even care and just want excuse to miss school. People are still trying to make 9/11 a holiday.

What a terrible post. A bunch of people who could have been their classmates are dead. They understand it could be have been them. But youre saying they only want a day off from school. What the Fuck is wrong with you?

Hes right.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Even though youre being satirical this is a violation of interstate commerce, and thus unconstitutional.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Yeah.

I dont know that guy.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

K181 posted...

Incoming and easily won lawsuits in three.... two.... one....

Under what claim?
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Not every guy has a dick bitch. And even the ones that do have dick bitches decide to randomly introduce them...how is that supposed to end an argument? If anything it will only raise more questions.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>